2. A curriculum change should reflect the common goals of the community. This is seen when the members could no longer survive using the techniques established by New-Fist. It was paramount to change their methods of teaching skills. Some members of the community even criticized the schools for implementing change. But without the necessary change, the community could not have survived. So even though some members staunchly defended New-Fist's curriculum, other forward thinkers were able to change the educational process for the better.
3. I believe that a curriculum should focus on skills as opposed to content knowledge. The Saber-Tooth curriculum defenders saw the teaching of the outdated skills as a generalization for other thought processes. For example, "We don't teach fish-grabbing to grab fish; we teach it to develop a generalized agility which can never be developed by mere training."
This thought process would not be helping the tribe have a better life, which is what New-Fist's goal was when he developed his curriculum. You must provide the children with the skills needed to survive in the present.
From the reading, the community faced the challenge of a changing environment. If they continued to catch fish, club horses, and scare saber-tooth tigers using New-Fist's methods, they would not survive.
I believe that New-Fist would be very proud of the radical who implored the wise old men "Couldn't you please try these other more up-to-date activities? Maybe they have some educational value after all?"

It's interesting to me that while it is perfectly obvious that New-Fist's curriculum needed to be updated in order to continue to meet the original objective, we cannot, in the present day, get the same consensus on the curriculum we are using to teach today's children.
ReplyDeleteIn my readings on curriculum, I learned that curricula that are more "successful" start with clearly stated objectives, as New-Fist's objectives that Larry stated here.
I like your analysis of the article. You write "A curriculum change should reflect the common goals of the community.." In a small state like New Jersey that still have 530+ district, each with its own values and goals, how do we create a common set of content and skills that students need for "survival" while still meeting local needs?
ReplyDelete